|
A friend of mine has a bumper sticker that
reads something like this: “How’s
that Hope and Change Working Out for
You?” I may not have the wording quite
right, but the sticker is obviously intended
as an attack on the Obama Administration.
So I’ll answer the questions, in form two but in substance just one.
My answer is, “Not very well.” I
think my friend would give the same answer,
but our reasons in each case would be very
different.
I regard the Obama Administration (so far, at least) as a failure for three main reasons:
- (Most important) The Democratic Party
remains badly divided and is led in both
houses of Congress very poorly.
- (Almost as important) The Republican
Party has adopted a strategy of
obstruction at all costs.
- (Pretty minor compared to items 1 and 2)
The President has allowed himself to
consider all sides of a question too
thoroughly.
It’s easy to consider Senate Majority
Leader Reid and House Speaker Pelosi as the
villains, but most of the Democratic
committee chairs have been at best weak, and
have too easily fallen prey to the same greed
and duplicity that beset their Republican
counterparts from the days of New Gingerich
onwards. It is also probably true that the
“pragmatic”,
“centrist” approach that came
into favor with Democrats after the election
of 1980 has led to a generation of party
hacks. Most Democratic leaders are so
committed to the “center” (as
they see it) that they do not entertain
decisive or creative ideas. Worse yet, they
often accept without demurrer Republican
premises, such as the vague, harmful notion
that all government expenditure is wasteful
and unproductive.
As for the Republicans, the conduct of their
leadership since the election of 2006 has
been nothing less than shameful and worse. I
say “worse” because their
strategy has been to obstruct all proposals
from the Democrats, regardless of merit,
purely for the sake of being able to say that
the Democrats are a “do-nothing”
party of “extreme liberals”. That
these two basic charges might contradict each
other is irrelevant. The main aim of
Republican strategy (or, if you like,
“conservative” strategy) at the
moment is to discredit the Obama
Administration and the Democratic Party. The
Republicans are doing remarkably well at this
work.
The President’s own conduct has
generally been that of an insect trapped on a
spider web. He struggles to get free, but the
struggle only enmeshes him more tightly in
the web - what web? The web of small favors,
of selfish interests, of needing to cobble
together a coalition. Two issues at this time
call attention to his problems:
- The decision over whether to deploy more
troops to Afghanistan and (if it is to be
done) how many and when.
-
The titanic struggle to pass a health-care bill.
In the first case, the President has dithered
too long. It may now be impossible to deploy
the troops before they are needed (if that is
the decision) or to bring about a complete
but orderly withdrawal (if that is needed).
For complete deployment, it should take from
four to six months; about the same time would
be needed to plan and execute a withdrawal.
Thus, whether or not the President makes a
major decision at the beginning of December,
getting that decision carried out by the time
the spring campaigning season begins is going
to be extremely difficult.
In the second matter, the health care bill,
the situation is quite remarkable. The
Democrats have managed to get a bill more or
less past the House of Representatives. It
now faces a great dilemma in the Senate -
liberal Democrats (of whom there are very
few, but in this case just one is enough)
insist on a “government” health
care option, while conservative Democrats
(or, to be more precise, Joe Lieberman,
supposedly an independent) refuse to vote for
a bill that has such a provision. Majority
Leader Reid (himself in dire trouble in his
home state) is unable to get the two sides to
raise their eyes enough to see that, just as
the Republicans will be happy with defeat of
health-care reform on any grounds, there is a need for the Democrats to pass a bill of any kind.
This last sentence
contains a dire condemnation of American
politics as practiced in 2009. We have ceased
on both sides to consider issues and
solutions on their merits, and have put
partisan interest above service to the
people. The blame is to be apportioned
equally to the leadership of both major
political parties and no small share of it
should be assigned to President Obama. (To be
fair, there is on the Republican side no
equivalent to President Obama - and such an
equivalent is certainly not Sarah Palin, whose incompetence and ignorance is so breathtaking that I get itches in unmentionable places whenever the optic arises.)
|